Bush those running defecate on the Constitution, so why not support Dr. Paul?

The Constitution is a contract among the citizenry, it is also a compact among the states. The Constitution protects individual rights and states rights against a government that has the power to oppress.





The only Candidate who has voted consistently in line with the constitution (or would ask to have it amended but would not just ignore it) is Dr. Paul.





George Bush thinks the Constitution is just a "goddamn piece of paper. So many on the republican stage right now seem like Bush-bots. Dr. Paul is a refreshing change for the country. He knows that you must know history or you will be doomed to repeat it. Anytime he wants to bring up history, his opponents disparage him. They do not want to talk about something they know nothing about.





So, why vote for big government, anti-constitutionalists and not for Dr. Paul?





Ohh, and go ahead and accuse me of being part of his campaign effort. I laugh every time a small mind accuses that on here. I am seeking honest answers.

Bush those running defecate on the Constitution, so why not support Dr. Paul?
Ron Paul has no chance.





19 thumbs down.





Vote for Rudy!
Reply:Ron Paul is a scholar of the constitution and he is the only one in the entire congress who proves it with his voting record.
Reply:I like Ron's concepts, I just wish HE understood the constitution.
Reply:we need a democrat running this country....


CLINTON all the way...........
Reply:And here come the lunatic, crazy, kook, isolationist, anarchist, born-in-the-wrong-time slurs.





Let 'em roll.





You can't be liberal and support the constitution... by definition. Have you ever wondered what conservative and liberal meant? conservatives stick to the letter of the constitution, liberals ignore it.





So don't lecture Paul on not being conservative enough.